Current gossip is speculating that Phil Hernandez has had a relationship with a man for some time, the RHA president or something from Grand Valley. From this, discussion has turned to the fact that, sooner or later, the gay community is probably going to have to claim Phil, as well as LaTool (Steve Latour).
I have worked hard for years to not be associated with either of these people, they both give me the heeby-jeebies, so I'm left with a choice. Do I go straight, when boobies and virginias do nothing for me, or do I reasearch a more creative solution?
Of course I went for the answer with flair. Back off, breasted ones!!!
Like my fellow homosexual brethren, I have chosen to create a new segment of gay society to meet my needs. Hey, we already have GLBTQ, why not GLBTQM?
What does the M stand for, you ask?
Gay Men Unaffiliated With Phil Hernandez Or Steve Latour
The g is silent, as in gnome and gnat, pronounced Moo-Fossil. Think The Lion King . . .
oooo, do it again
Note: this journal entry in no way should serve as an "outing" vehicle for these two people, as it is just a humorous anecdote related to someone's idle speculation. I hoping this disclaimer is enough to keep rugbynut2 from hitting me.